(Picture is of Matt Cutts, Google Engineer and unoffficial SEO-liaison)
There’s an interesting story about Google called "Publishers vs. the Censorbot" making its way around the blogosphere today. In short, publishers that rely on Google AdSense for advertising revenue may being ‘penalized’ by Google depending on the content’s subject matter – when the content contains keywords that Google deems objectionable, Google refuses to display ads next to it.
The Good Morning Silicon Valley post on the story has a great title asking a hypothetical journalist to work "mesothelioma" into an unrelated story, a reference to one of the highest paying AdSense keywords. While the comment is obviously in jest, it does bring up an interesting dilemma for publishers (or anyone else) that rely on Google for part of their revenue. Should you be optimizing for Google or for your audience?
The search engine optimization (SEO) industry has been dealing with this issue for years. Should your pages work well for users or should they be optimized for search engines? Sometimes, though not always, the techniques for each strategy are mutually exclusive. Now that Google accounts for more than 60% of US searches (according to Hitwise), many e-commerce sites can attribute an even a greater percentage of their revenue to Google than previously. As the number of pages indexed bounce up and down in Google’s index, so does the site revenue. Now, publishers relying on AdSense revenue are tackling similar issues and struggling for the answers.
It seems that in the Google ecosystem, the relationships might not be as symbiotic as first thought. Rather, it’s more like "live by the Google sword, die by the Google sword…"
Subscribe to Alacra Blog
- Inside the LEI – Issue VIII January 27, 2016
- Why is it so hard to know who you’re doing business with? January 20, 2016
- What do banks need to know about their customers, but don’t? January 15, 2016
- Opus Extends its Regulatory Technology Leadership with Strong 2015 Results January 13, 2016
- Opus Makes Strategic Equity Investment in OThot January 6, 2016